The Origins of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW)

The climate change debate has been a contentious issue for decades, with proponents on both sides presenting various arguments. However, a closer examination of the origins of the “Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming” (CAGW) narrative reveals a more complex story. According to engineer and Earth Sciences expert Allan Malcolm MacRae, this concept emerged in 1985 as a political construct, rather than a scientific consensus.

• The United Nations played a significant role in shaping the narrative, using it to mislead the public and policymakers.
• The focus on CO2 as a primary driver of climate change is misplaced, and low CO2 levels pose a greater threat to life on Earth than high levels.

A Natural Phenomenon vs. A Political Agenda

MacRae’s book, “Green Energy Genocide: The Climate Scam,” argues that climate change is a natural occurrence, rather than a human-induced catastrophe. He cites the last Ice Age as an example, where diminished CO2 levels nearly halted photosynthesis, potentially leading to an extinction event.

Falsehoods and Misdirection

MacRae accuses proponents of the climate change narrative of knowingly promoting falsehoods, driven by political and financial incentives. He claims that the narrative has led to the misallocation of trillions of dollars into green energy projects that he deems inefficient and unreliable.

• The focus on intermittent energy sources like wind and solar has jeopardized the stability of power grids.
• The pursuit of green energy has led to energy shortages and higher costs, impacting millions of people worldwide.

A Reevaluation of Priorities

MacRae advocates for a return to reliable, dispatchable energy sources, emphasizing the importance of energy efficiency and the abatement of real atmospheric pollution. He believes that the climate narrative has become a distraction from genuine environmental challenges and calls for a reevaluation of priorities.

“We need to focus on the real environmental issues, such as pollution and access to clean water, rather than getting bogged down in a climate narrative that has become a myth.”
— Allan Malcolm MacRae

A Call to Action

MacRae’s book is a thought-provoking critique of the prevailing climate change narrative. Whether one agrees with his views or not, it is a compelling contribution to an ongoing and critical debate. As we move forward, it is essential to consider the complexities of the issue and to reevaluate our priorities.

Conclusion

The book “Green Energy Genocide: The Climate Scam” offers a unique perspective on the climate change debate. MacRae’s arguments, backed by scientific studies and expert opinions, challenge the foundations of the climate change narrative. By considering these arguments, we can gain a deeper understanding of the issue and work towards finding a more balanced and sustainable solution.